Continuity of Covariance Operator

We start with Kolmogorovโ€™s continuity theorem which lies at the heart of continuous martingale theory.

Theorem 1 (Kolmogorov). Let {๐‘‹๐‘ก}๐‘กโ‰ฅ0 be a real-valued stochastic process such that there exist ๐›ผ,๐›ฝ,๐พ satisfying

๐”ผ[|๐‘‹๐‘กโˆ’๐‘‹๐‘ |๐›ผ]โ‰ค๐พ|๐‘กโˆ’๐‘ |1+๐›ฝ,

for any ๐‘ก,๐‘ โ‰ฅ0. Then ๐‘‹ has a ๐›พโ€“Hรถlder continuous modification for any 0<๐›พ<๐›ฝ๐›ผ.

By noticing the ultracontractivity of Gaussian measures, we immediately derive that fractional Brownian motion ๐ต๐ป has a ๐›พโ€“Hรถlder modification where 0<๐›พ<๐ป. More generally, we can show that any centered Gaussian random field {๐‘‹(๐‘ฅ)}๐‘ฅโˆˆโ„๐‘‘ with covariance ๐ถ has a ๐›พโ€“Hรถlder modification where 0<๐›พ<๐ป if

๐ถ(๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฅ)+๐ถ(๐‘ฆ,๐‘ฆ)โˆ’2๐ถ(๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฆ)โ‰ค๐พ|๐‘ฅโˆ’๐‘ฆ|2๐ป.

(1)

Here, ๐ถ is given by ๐ถ(๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฆ)=๐”ผ[๐‘‹(๐‘ฅ)๐‘‹(๐‘ฆ)]. This, of course, implies the continuity of ๐ถ. But, can we circumvent using Kolmogorovโ€™s theorem?

Proposition 2. Let ๐ถ:โ„๐‘‘ร—โ„๐‘‘โ†’โ„ be symmetric, locally bounded, and positive definite in the sense that for any finite collection {๐‘ฅ๐‘–}๐‘–=1๐‘š in โ„๐‘‘, the matrix ๐‘€๐‘–๐‘—=๐ถ(๐‘ฅ๐‘–,๐‘ฅ๐‘—) is positive definite. Then Equationย 1 implies the joint continuity of ๐ถ.

Proof. By assumption we take the positive definite matrix

๐‘€=(๐ถ(๐‘ฆ,๐‘ฆ)๐ถ(๐‘ฆ,๐‘ฅ1)๐ถ(๐‘ฆ,๐‘ฅ2)๐ถ(๐‘ฅ1,๐‘ฆ)๐ถ(๐‘ฅ1,๐‘ฅ1)๐ถ(๐‘ฅ1,๐‘ฅ2)๐ถ(๐‘ฅ2,๐‘ฆ)๐ถ(๐‘ฅ2,๐‘ฅ1)๐ถ(๐‘ฅ2,๐‘ฅ2))

and vector

๐›ผ=(๐ถ(๐‘ฅ1,๐‘ฅ1)+๐ถ(๐‘ฅ2,๐‘ฅ2)โˆ’2๐ถ(๐‘ฅ1,๐‘ฅ2)๐ถ(๐‘ฅ2,๐‘ฆ)โˆ’๐ถ(๐‘ฅ1,๐‘ฆ)๐ถ(๐‘ฅ1,๐‘ฆ)โˆ’๐ถ(๐‘ฅ2,๐‘ฆ)).

Then we notice ๐›ผโŠค๐‘€๐›ผโ‰ฅ0 is equivalent to

[๐ถ(๐‘ฅ1,๐‘ฆ)โˆ’๐ถ(๐‘ฅ2,๐‘ฆ)]2โ‰ค4๐ถ(๐‘ฆ,๐‘ฆ)[๐ถ(๐‘ฅ1,๐‘ฅ1)+๐ถ(๐‘ฅ2,๐‘ฅ2)โˆ’2๐ถ(๐‘ฅ1,๐‘ฅ2)].

By the triangle inequality we conclude the proof.โ โˆŽ